LAK24

Engagement culture is a research-based, systemic approach to motivation that fosters satisfaction and minimizes dissatisfaction. It is linked with academic success in high poverty schools.

Application

What is your measure/metric called?

Engagement Culture

Tell us a little about your measure/metric. (What data does it utilize? How is that data processed? Does it measure an observable or latent construct?)

The Engagement Culture construct, though latent, is discerned through a set of key variables. These variables encapsulate systemic indicators of intrinsic motivation, overall satisfaction, minimal dissatisfaction, and minimal coercion; were informed by Herzberg’s (1974, 2011) research; and use data already collected by local education agencies. The aim is to identify nuanced cultural qualities that, though not directly observable, play a pivotal role in shaping academic performance.

Since student engagement is recognized as the result of intrinsic motivation (M.-T. Wang & Degol, 2014) and cannot be coerced (Schlechty, 2011; Senge, 2006), cultures that value coercion foster compliance at best and potentially noncompliance, apathy, and disengagement. Schools that value positive coercion may positively affect academic performance measures, but those that prioritize intrinsic motivation foster true engagement (Schlechty, 2011; Senge, 2006).

Through statistical analysis of data drawn from high-poverty campuses, we have found that the Engagement Culture construct explains academic growth in these challenging contexts. This research focuses on deciphering and enhancing the underlying dynamics that influence educational outcomes. We presented our study at the AERA Annual Conference in 2023, highlighting the significance of intrinsic motivation and overall satisfaction as essential components of a positive engagement culture. 

What problem does your measure/metric solve?

Even though “culture” is frequently cited as a driver of student outcomes, what is meant by culture and how schools should shape it to manifest improved academic performance is problematic. Schools need systemwide indicators to guide intervention decisions, specifically focused on alterable variables (Reschly & Christenson, 2012) to systemically grow student engagement (Fredricks, Reschly, & Christenson, 2019).

Who will be using it? (teachers, students, parents, engineers, administrators)

Engagement culture has implications for educators at all levels, from the classroom to state and federal legislators—anyone who is interested in improving outcomes for students. This includes teachers, students, parents, employers, community members, and administrators.

References

Allen, R. D. & McKay, C. B. (1930). Measuring the effect of guidance by the holding power of a senior high school. Junior-Senior High School Clearing House, 5(1), 18-21. http://www.jstor.com/stable/30173264

American Diploma Project. (2004). Ready or not: Creating a high school diploma that counts: Executive summary. American Diploma Project, Achieve. https://www.achieve.org/files/ReadyorNot.pdf

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives (Abridged). Longman.

Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2020). Kids count data book: State trends in child well-being. https://www.aecf.org/resources/2020-kids-count-data-book/

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303

Argyris, C. (1976). Increasing leadership effectiveness. Wiley.https://archive.org/details/increasingleader0000argy/page/n311/mode/2up

Audas, R., & Willms, J. D. (2001). Engagement and dropping out of school: A life-course perspective. Applied Research Branch, Human Resources Development Canada. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255041045_Engagement_and_Dropping_Out_of_School_A_Life-Course_Perspective

Balfanz, R. & Byrnes, V. (2019). Early warning indicators and intervention systems: State of the field. In J. A. Fredricks, A. L. Reschly, & S. L. Christenson’s (Eds.), Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students (pp. 45-55). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00004-8

Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., & Mac Iver, D. J. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701621079

Berliner, D. C. (2009). Poverty and potential: Out-of-school factors and school success. The Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice.

Bertalanffy, L. V. (1969). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. Braziller.

Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Budge, K. M. & Parrett, W. H. (2018). Disrupting poverty: Five powerful classroom practices. ASCD.

Caesar, V. & Caesar, C. A. (2006). The high achiever’s guide to happiness. Corwin Press.

California Department of Education. (2019). Cumulative Enrollment Data [Data set]. https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/sd/filesenrcum.asp

Census Reporter. (2019). Dallas, TX. https://censusreporter.org/profiles/16000US4819000-dallas-tx/

Chingos, M. M. & Blagg, K. (2017).​ Making sense of state school funding policy. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/making-sense-state-school-funding-policy

Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2012). Algebra for 8th graders: Evidence on its effects from 10 North Carolina districts (No. w18649). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w18649

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.

Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2019). Development Process. http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/development-process/

Cooke, R. A. & Rousseau, D. M. (1988). Behavioral norms and expectations: A quantitative approach to the assessment of organizational culture. Group & Organization Studies, 13(3), 245-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960118801300302

Congressional Research Service. (2013). The Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act: A primer (CRS Report No. RL33960). https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL33960.html

Crawson, M. (2020, February 4). Hierarchical multiple regression using SPSS (February 2020) [Video]. https://youtu.be/RyDteu6E7HY

Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE. 

Culwell, C. & Carney, D. (2017). Impact of the 85th legislature on state accountability [Conference presentation]. TASA/TASB Convention. https://www.moakcasey.com/articles/viewarticledoc.aspx/TASA-TASB_Impact%20of%20the%2085th%20on%20State%20Accountability_Oct2017_FINAL%20POST_10-7-17.pdf?AID=17701&DID=14245

Dallas Area Habitat for Humanity. (2015). Dallas Map Book. https://media-exp1.licdn.com/dms/document/C562DAQGhGiUGQyzW1A/profile-treasury-document-pdf-analyzed/0/1584031310842?e=1612458000&v=beta&t=0xxX966BNg_yZXG7Yuve-3vGKjtLeqCwF0U3L1gvkS0

Dallas County Promise. (2021). About. https://dallascountypromise.org/about

Dallas ISD. (2019a). Panorama survey: Side-by-side comparison (grades 6-12). https://tei.dallasisd.org/download/8136/

Dallas ISD. (2019b). Panorama survey: Side-by-side comparison (grades 3-5). https://tei.dallasisd.org/download/8133/

Dallas ISD. (2020a). About John Leslie Patton, Jr. Academic Center. https://www.dallasisd.org/domain/2705

Dallas ISD. (2020b). Dallas ISD 18-19 las plan 90510 tea feedback.https://dallasisd.mycusthelp.com/WEBAPP/_rs/(S(xomvhw5m3jcow4njelhcv3og))/SupportHome.aspx?sSessionID=

Dallas ISD. (2020c). Dallas ISD campus staff engagement and support survey sample: Fall 2018 [Unpublished raw data]. https://dallasisd.mycusthelp.com/WEBAPP/_rs/(S(xomvhw5m3jcow4njelhcv3og))/SupportHome.aspx?sSessionID=

Dallas ISD. (2020d). Dallas ISD parent guardian satisfaction survey results: Spring 2019 [Unpublished raw data]. https://dallasisd.mycusthelp.com/WEBAPP/_rs/(S(xomvhw5m3jcow4njelhcv3og))/SupportHome.aspx?sSessionID=

Dallas ISD. (2020e). 2019 local accountability system manual.https://www.dallasisd.org/cms/lib/TX01001475/Centricity/Domain/16840/2019%20Local%20Accountability%20System%20Manual%20FINAL.pdf

Dallas ISD. (2020f). LAS/state accountability report cards. https://www.dallasisd.org/Page/66873

Dallas ISD. (2020g). Climate Survey 18-19 [Unpublished raw data]. https://dallasisd.mycusthelp.com/WEBAPP/_rs/(S(xomvhw5m3jcow4njelhcv3og))/SupportHome.aspx?sSessionID=

Davis, G. (2017, December 19). Dallas ISD 2018-2019 calendar. https://thehub.dallasisd.org/2017/12/19/see-the-approved-dallas-isd-calendar-for-2018-2019-school-year/

Davis, M. H., Mac Iver, M. A., Balfanz, R. W., Stein, M. L., & Fox, J. H. (2019). Implementation of an early warning indicator and intervention system. Preventing School Failure, 63(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2018.1506977

Deal, T. & Peterson, K. (2016). Shaping school culture: Pitfalls, paradoxes, and promises (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

DeVos, B., Nielsen, K. M., Azar, A. M., & Whittaker, M. (2018). Final report of the federal commission on school safety. Presented to the President of the United States. https://www2.ed.gov/documents/school-safety/school-safety-report.pdf

District of Columbia Public Schools. (2019). DCPS at a glance: Enrollment. https://dcps.dc.gov/node/966292

Domina, T., Pharris-Ciurej, N., Penner, A. M., Penner, E. K., Brummet, Q., Porter, S. R., & Sanabria, T. (2018). Is free and reduced-price lunch a valid measure of educational disadvantage? Educational Researcher, 47(9), 539-555. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X18797609

Education Service Center Region XIII. (n.d.) School improvement. https://esc13.net/statewide-initiatives/school-improvement

Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. (1965). https://www2.ed.gov/documents/essa-act-of-1965.pdf

Elsaadi, H. (2015). The cost of education: An in depth look into Texas's education funding system over the last two decades. Texas A&M Journal of Property Law, 2, 341-385. https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/journal-of-property-law/vol2/iss3/1

Erichsen, K., & Reynolds, J. (2019). Public school accountability, workplace culture, and teacher morale. Social Science Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102347

Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 (2015). https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ95/PLAW-114publ95.pdf

Florida Department of Education. (2019a). English language learners (code ly) by district by race/ethnicity 2018-19, final survey 2 [Data set]. http://www.fldoe.org/accountability/data-sys/edu-info-accountability-services/pk-12-public-school-data-pubs-reports/archive.stml

Florida Department of Education. (2019b). Lunch status by district (for federal funding) 2018-19, final survey 2 [Data set]. http://www.fldoe.org/accountability/data-sys/edu-info-accountability-services/pk-12-public-school-data-pubs-reports/archive.stml

Florida Department of Education. (2019c). Total enrollment/membership by district by race/ethnicity 2018-19, final survey 2 [Data set]. http://www.fldoe.org/accountability/data-sys/edu-info-accountability-services/pk-12-public-school-data-pubs-reports/archive.stml

Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2019a). Interventions for student engagement: Overview and state of the field. In J. A. Fredricks, A. L. Reschly, & S. L. Christenson’s (Eds.), Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students (pp. 1-11). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00001-2

Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2019b). Conclusion: Status of student engagement interventions. In J. A. Fredricks, A. L. Reschly, & S. L. Christenson’s (Eds.), Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students (pp. 375-389). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00025-5

Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M.-T., Schall Linn, J., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009

Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Wang, M.-T., & Brauer, S. (2019). Profiles of school disengagement: Not all disengaged students are alike. In J. A. Fredricks, A. L. Reschly, & S. L. Christenson’s (Eds.), Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students (pp. 31-43). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00003-6

García, E. & Weiss, E. (2019). U.S. schools struggle to hire and retain teachers. Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/publication/u-s-schools-struggle-to-hire-and-retain-teachers-the-second-report-in-the-perfect-storm-in-the-teacher-labor-market-series/

García, E. (2020). Schools are still segregated, and black children are paying a price. Economic Policy Institute. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED603475

Gerlach, B., Tennant, P., & McKerlie, K. (2018). Building capacity for restorative discipline in Texas: An evaluation of the Texas schools Restorative Discipline Project. The University of Texas at Austin, Texas Institute for Child & Family Wellbeing. https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/RD_Final_Report_8.31.18_UT.pdf

Georgia Department of Education. (2019a). Free and reduced price meal eligibility [Data set]. https://oraapp.doe.k12.ga.us/ows-bin/owa/fte_pack_frl001_public.entry_form

Georgia Department of Education. (2019b). Student enrollment by grade level (pk-12) [Data set]. https://oraapp.doe.k12.ga.us/ows-bin/owa/fte_pack_enrollgrade.entry_form

Georgia Department of Education. (2019c). Enrollment by ethnicity/race and gender [Data set]. https://oraapp.doe.k12.ga.us/ows-bin/owa/fte_pack_ethnicsex_pub.entry_form

Geverdt, D. E., (2018). Education demographic and geographic estimates (EDGE) program: Geocodes: Public schools and local education agencies. Report number: NCES 2018-080. NCES and U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/docs/EDGE_GEOCODE_PUBLIC_FILEDOC.pdf

Goleman, D. (2011). Leadership that gets results. In On managing people (pp. 1-27). Harvard Business Review Press.

Grande, T. L. (2016, November 27). Interpreting output for multiple regression in SPSS. [Video]. https://youtu.be/WQeAsZxsXdQ

Guskey, T. R., & Bailey, J. M. (2001). Developing grading and reporting systems for student learning. Corwin Press.

Hansard, C. (2016). Searching for the missing piece: An examination of the constitutional language in Texas’s education clause that continues to fuel the puzzling school finance saga. Texas Tech Law Review—Online Edition, 48(1), 1-38. http://texastechlawreview.org/volume-48/

Hearnsberger, L. M. (2021). Does culture eat poverty for breakfast? exploring the role of engagement for achievement in U.S. schools (Order No. 28649275). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2563500433). Retrieved from https://lib.pepperdine.edu/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.lib.pepperdine.edu/dissertations-theses/does-culture-eat-poverty-breakfast-exploring-role/docview/2563500433/se-2?accountid=13159

Hendrick, C. (2019, May 21). Local accountability system (las) with TEA (presentation). Education Service Center Region 20.

Hernandez, R. & Zamora, R. (2018). The relationship between organizational health and student achievement in high poverty schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(11), 56-76. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.11.5

Herzberg, F. (1974). Motivation-hygiene profiles: Pinpointing what ails the organization. Organizational dynamics, 3(2), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(74)90007-2

Herzberg, F. (2011). One more time: How do you motivate employees? In On managing people (pp. 29-50). Harvard Business Review Press.

Hill, W. (2015, April 24). Cross validation [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/I8T9tYpW_lQ

Hoffman, L. (2012). Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility Data in Ed" Facts": A White Paper on Current Status and Potential Changes. Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, U.S. Department of Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED556048

Hofkens, T. L., & Ruzek, E. (2019). Measuring student engagement to inform effective interventions in schools. In J. A. Fredricks, A. L. Reschly, & S. L. Christenson’s (Eds.), Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students (pp. 309-324). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00021-8

House Bill 22. TEC § 39.053. (2017, June 15). https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/85R/billtext/html/HB00022F.htm

Idrovo, A. J. (2011). Three criteria for ecological fallacy. Environmental health perspectives, 119(8), A332. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103768

Illinois State Board of Education. (2019). Illinois report card: City of Chicago sd 299. https://www.illinoisreportcard.com/District.aspx?source=studentcharacteristics&Districtid=15016299025

Jung, T., Scott, T. Davies, H. T. O., Bower, P., Whalley, D., McNally, R., & Mannion, R. (2009). Instruments for exploring organizational culture: A review of the literature. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1087-1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02066.x

Juvonen, J., Espinoza, G., & Knifsend, C. (2012). The role of peer relationships in student academic and extracurricular engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie’s (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 387-401). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_18

Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press

Kotter, J. P. & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. The Free Press.

Laerd Statistics. (n.d.-a). Hierarchical multiple regression: SPSS statistics. https://statistics.laerd.com/premium/spss/hmr/hierarchical-multiple-regression-in-spss.php

Laerd Statistics. (n.d.-b). Multiple regression: SPSS statistics. https://statistics.laerd.com/premium/spss/mr/multiple-regression-in-spss.php

Laerd Statistics. (n.d.-c). Transformations: SPSS statistics. https://statistics.laerd.com/premium/spss/t/transformations-in-spss.php

Laerd Statistics, (n-d.-d). Pearson Product-Moment Correlation: SPSS Statistics. https://statistics.laerd.com/premium/spss/pc/pearson-correlation-in-spss-12.php

Lam, S., Wong, B. P. H., Yang, H., & Liu, Y. (2012). Understanding student engagement with a contextual model. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie’s (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 403-419). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_19

Lunenburg, F. C. (2017). Organizational structure and design. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, 1(1), 21–43. https://go.southernct.edu/jelps/files/JELPS-Volume-1-Issue-1-1212017.pdf

MacNeil, A. J., Prater, D. L., & Busch, S. (2009). The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120701576241

Marquez, M. (2019, September 25). The effective schools framework (ESF) overview: Titche campus culture rubric [Course exemplar]. Education Service Center Region 13. https://ecampus.esc13.net/show_class_info.html?classid=42025

Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Morin, A. J. S., Abduljabbar, A. S. & Köller, O. (2012). Classroom climate and contextual effects: Conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 106-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.670488

Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organization design. Management Science, 26(3), 322-341.

Mishook, J., Foley, E., Thompson, J., & Kubiak, M. (2008). Beyond test scores: Leading indicators for education. InUsing data for decisions (pp. 39-47). Annenberg Institute for School Reform, Voices in Urban Education. https://www.annenberginstitute.org/sites/default/files/VUE18.pdf

Morath, M. (2019, November 5). Commissioner’s remarks: Texas Assessment Conference [Speech].

Mordechay, K., Gándara, P., & Orfield, G. (2019). Embracing the effects of demographic change. Educational Leadership, 76(7), 34-40.

Mordechay, K., & Orfield, G. (2017). Demographic transformation in a policy vacuum: The changing face of U.S. metropolitan society and challenges for public schools. The Educational Forum, 81(2), 193-203.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (n.d.). Sputnik and the dawn of the space age. https://history.nasa.gov/sputnik.html

National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.) Fast facts: Title I schools. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=158

National Center for Education Statistics. (2020a). Results from the 2019 Mathematics and Reading Assessments at Grade 12. U.S. Department of Education and the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) [Data set]. https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/mathematics/supportive_files/2019_infographic_G12_math_reading.pdf

National Center for Education Statistics. (2020b). Common core of data: Public elementary/secondary school universe survey data, v.1a [Data set]. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/files.asp

National Governors Association & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2008). Benchmarking for Success: Ensuring U.S. Students Receive a World-Class Education. http://www.corestandards.org/assets/0812BENCHMARKING.pdf

New York State Education Department. (2019). NYC public schools enrollment (2018-19). https://data.nysed.gov/enrollment.php?year=2019&instid=7889678368

Ng, C., Bartlett, B., & Elliott, S. N. (2018). Empowering engagement: Creating learning opportunities for students from challenging backgrounds. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94652-8_1

Nichols, S. L. & Dawson, H. S. (2012). Assessment as a context for student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie’s (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 457-477). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_22

Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). SAGE.

Pajo, B. (2018). Introduction to research methods: A hands-on approach. SAGE.

Pennsylvania State University: Eberly College of Science. (2018). Applied regression analysis: Distinction between outliers and high leverage observations. https://online.stat.psu.edu/stat462/node/170/

Record, L. (2017). Tableau classroom training: Desktop I: Fundamentals. [Course materials]. Tableau. https://www.tableau.com/learn/classroom

Rentner, D. S., Scott, C., Kober, N., Chudowsky, N., Chudowsky, V., Joftus S., & Zabala, D. (2006). From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind act. The George Washington University Center for Education Policy. https://www.cep-dc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=301

Reschly, A. L. & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie’s (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3-20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1

Ryan, S. V., Nathaniel, P., Pendergast, L. L., Saeki, E., Segool, N., & Schwing, S. (2017). Leaving the teaching profession: The role of teacher stress and educational accountability policies on turnover intent. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.016

San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S.__(1973). https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep411001/

SAS Institute, Inc. (1999). SAS/QC user's guide: Comparison of P-P plots and Q-Q plots. http://v8doc.sas.com/sashtml/qc/chap8/sect9.htm

Schanfield, M. R., Chang, H. N., & Osher, D. M. (2019). Chronic absence: A sign to invest in conditions for learning. In J. A. Fredricks, A. L. Reschly, & S. L. Christenson’s (Eds.), Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students (pp. 183-198). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00013-9

Schein, E. H. & Schein, P. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 

Schlechty, P. C. (2011). Engaging students: The next level of working on the work. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.lib.pepperdine.edu

Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1). https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809

The School District of Philadelphia. (2019). School enrollment and demographics: Sy 2018-2019 [Data set]. https://www.philasd.org/performance/programsservices/open-data/school-information/#school_enrollment

Senate Bill 1. TEC § 37. (1995, May 30). https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/74R/billtext/html/SB00001F.htm 

Senate Bill 133. TEC § 37. (1997, June 19). https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/75R/billtext/html/SB00133F.HTM

Senate Bill 1451. TEC § 37. (2019, June 10). https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/86R/billtext/html/SB01451F.HTM

Senge, P. M. (2000). Systems change in education. Reflections, 1(3), 52–60. https://lib.pepperdine.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=5323988&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency.

Senge, P. M., Kleiner, A, Roberts, C., Ross, R. B., & Smith, B. J. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. Doubleday.

Smithsonian National Museum of American History Behring Center. (n.d.) Mobilizing minds: Teaching math and science in the age of Sputnik. https://americanhistory.si.edu/mobilizing-minds/reform

State Board of Education. (1937). Report of the results of the Texas statewide school adequacy survey. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.$b385161

Statistics Solutions. (n.d.) Testing assumptions of linear regression in SPSS. https://www.statisticssolutions.com/testing-assumptions-of-linear-regression-in-spss/

Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Taylor & Francis.

Suitts, S. (2013). A new majority update: Low income students in the South and nation. Southern Education Foundation. https://www.southerneducation.org/publications/newmajorityupdate/

Suitts, S. (2015). A new majority update: Low income students in the South and nation. Southern Education Foundation.https://www.southerneducation.org/publications/newmajorityresearchbulletin/

Swaby, A. & Cai, M. (2019, August 21). Texas schools with more student poverty got the most Ds and Fs in to state ratings. The Texas Tribune. https://www.ktsa.com/texas-schools-with-more-student-poverty-got-the-most-ds-and-fs-in-state-ratings/

Texas Classroom Teachers Association. (2014). Removing disruptive students from class. https://tcta.org/sites/tcta.org/files/removal_of_students_a_guide_for_members_0.pdf

Texas Education Agency. (n.d.-a). Education service centers. https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/other-services/education-service-centers

Texas Education Agency. (n.d.-b). PEIMS-overview. https://tea.texas.gov/Reports_and_/Data_Submission/PEIMS/PEIMS_-_Overview/

Texas Education Agency. (n.d.-c). Texas assessment: Understanding your child’s score. https://texasassessment.com/staar/families/understanding-the-test-score/

Texas Education Agency. (n.d.-d). TEA strategic plan. https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/welcome-and-overview/tea-strategic-plan

Texas Education Agency. (2004). Texas public schools sesquicentennial handbook. https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/welcome-and-overview/texas-public-schools-sesquicentennial-handbook

Texas Education Agency. (2017a). 2018-2019: Texas education data standards (TEDS).http://castro.tea.state.tx.us/tsds/teds/2019P/teds-ds1.0.pdf

Texas Education Agency. (2017b). 2017 accountability manual for Texas public school districts and campuses. https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/2017AccountabilityManual_accessible.pdf

Texas Education Agency. (2017c). HB 22 overview: Draft for discussion purposes only. https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/ATA-06_HB%2022%20Overview%20One%20Pager.pdf

Texas Education Agency. (2018a). The implementation of House Bill 22: Collaborating to build a better accountability system. https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/A-F_Overview_fnl_v03_AR.pdf

Texas Education Agency. (2018b). House Bill 22 2018 accountability FAQs. https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/HB22%20FAQ_fnl.pdf

Texas Education Agency. (2018c). House Bill 22 2018 accountability decisions framework. https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/2018AccountabilityDecisionsFramework.pdf

Texas Education Agency. (2018d). 2018 annual report. https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/news-and-multimedia/annual-reports/annual-report-2018

Texas Education Agency. (2019a). STAAR resources. https://tea.texas.gov/Student_Testing_and_Accountability/Testing/State_of_Texas_Assessments_of_Academic_Readiness

Texas Education Agency. (2019b). Student testing and accountability. https://tea.texas.gov/Student_Testing_and_Accountability

Texas Education Agency. (2019c). 2019 Data download [Data set]. https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2019/download.html

Texas Education Agency. (2019d). Texas academic performance report: 2017-18 state postsecondary outcomes yearly details. https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&_debug=0&single=N&batch=N&app=PUBLIC&ptype=H&_program=perfrept.perfmast.sas&level=state&search=distnum&namenum=&prgopt=2019/tapr/ps_outcomes.sas

Texas Education Agency. (2019e). A–f accountability system overview: Understanding a–f ratings in Texas. https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/TXSchools_Districts_4-pager_final_acc_FORWEB_0.pdf

Texas Education Agency. (2019f). Texas academic performance report: 2018-2019 district student information, Dallas ISD. https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&_debug=0&single=N&batch=N&app=PUBLIC&ptype=H&_program=perfrept.perfmast.sas&level=district&search=distnum&namenum=057905&prgopt=2019/tapr/student.sas

Texas Education Agency. (2019g). Academic accountability: House Public Education Committee [Meeting presentation].https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/3.%20A-F%20-%20FINAL%201.30%20%28accessible%29.pdf

Texas Education Agency. (2019h). 2019 accountability manual. https://tea.texas.gov/texas-schools/accountability/academic-accountability/performance-reporting/2019-accountability-manual

Texas Education Agency. (2019i). Campus level annual discipline summary: PEIMS discipline data for 2018-2019 [Data set]. https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/adhocrpt/Disciplinary_Data_Products/Download_All_Campuses.html

Texas Education Agency. (2019j). TSDS web-enabled data standards: C-165 disciplinary-action-reason-code.https://tealprod.tea.state.tx.us/TWEDS/66/283/502/0/CodeTable/List/8035

Texas Education Agency. (2019k). 2018-19 TAPR advanced data download [Data set]. https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/tapr/2019/download/DownloadData.html

Texas Education Agency. (2019l). 2018-2019 campus type data search [Data set]. https://tea.texas.gov/reports-and-data/school-data/campus-and-district-type-data-search

Texas Education Agency. (2019m). Effective schools framework: A clear vision for what districts and schools across the state do to ensure an excellent education for all Texas students. https://texasesf.org

Texas Education Agency. (2019n). ESF lever 3: Positive school culture. https://texasesf.org/framework/prioritized-lever-3/

Texas Education Agency. (2019o). Highlights of the 2018–19 local accountability system.https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/Highlights%20of%202018-19%20LAS%20Districts.pdf

Texas Education Agency. (2019p). Comprehensive glossary: 2018–19 Texas academic performance report. https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/tapr/2019/glossary.pdf

Texas Education Agency. (2019q). Texas academic performance report: 2018-2019 district student information, Snyder ISD. https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/cgi/sas/broker?_service=marykay&_debug=0&single=N&batch=N&app=PUBLIC&ptype=H&_program=perfrept.perfmast.sas&level=district&search=distnum&namenum=208902&prgopt=2019/tapr/student.sas

Texas Education Agency. (2019r). 2019 accountability overview: Bryan Adams HS.https://txschools.gov/schools/057905001/overview

Texas Education Agency. (2019s). Local accountability systems (las).

Texas Education Agency. (2019t). 2019 annual report. https://tea.texas.gov/about-tea/news-and-multimedia/annual-reports/annual-report

Texas Education Agency. (2020a). Discipline summary reports. https://tea.texas.gov/reports-and-data/student-data/discipline-data-products/discipline-summary-reports

Texas Education Agency. (2020b). Current schools [Data set]. https://tea-texas.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/6cf4436417ff43d0a6e741dc83339ae2_0/data?selectedAttribute=DisplayX

Texas Education Agency. (2020c). TEKS review and revision. https://tea.texas.gov/academics/curriculum-standards/teks-review/teks-review-and-revision

Texas Education Agency. (2020d). Local accountability system: Frequently asked questions. https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/TXschools_FAQ%202020%20Update_v02_fnl.pdf

Texas Education Agency. (2020e). Campus level annual discipline summary: PEIMS discipline data for 2019-2020 [Data set]. https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/adhocrpt/Disciplinary_Data_Products/Download_All_Campuses.html

Texas Education Agency. (2020f). TEA mission and responsibilities. https://tea.texas.gov/texas-schools/general-information/tea-mission-and-responsibilities

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. (n.d.). “The case for a postsecondary credential.” http://www.60x30tx.com/why-60x30tx/

Texas Legislative Council. (1995). Texas legislature summary of enactments: 74th legislature, regular session, 1995. University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History. https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth653602/

Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D'Alessa, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357-385. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24434163

Tompkins, T. C. & Rhodes, K. (2012). Groupthink and the ladder of inference: Increasing effective decision making. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 8(2), 84-90. http://www.hraljournal.com/Page/11%20Tompkins%20Rhodes-2.pdf

University of California Los Angeles: Statistical Consulting Group. (n.d.-a). Regression with SPSS chapter 1: Simple and multiple regression. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/spss/webbooks/reg/chapter1/regressionwith-spsschapter-1-simple-and-multiple-regression/

University of California Los Angeles: Statistical Consulting Group. (n.d.-b). SPSS web books regression with SPSS chapter 2: Regression diagnostics. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/spss/webbooks/reg/chapter2/spss-webbooksregressionwith-spsschapter-2-regression-diagnostics/

University of California Los Angeles: Statistical Consulting Group. (n.d.-c). Introduction to regression with SPSS lesson 2: SPSS regression diagnostics. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/spss/seminars/introduction-to-regression-with-spss/introreg-lesson2/#s2

Urdan, T. C. (2010). Statistics in plain English (4th ed.). Routledge.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2019). Metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas population totals and components of change: 2010-2019. https://www.census.gov/content/census/en/data/datasets/time-series/demo/popest/2010s-total-metro-and-micro-statistical-areas.html

U.S. Congress House Committee on Education and Labor. (1958). National defense education act: Report to accompany h.r. 13247 (Ser. 85th cong., 2d sess. house of representatives. report, no. 2157). http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/16394558.html

U.S. Department of Education, Federal Student Aid Office. (n.d.-a). Federal Pell Grants are usually awarded only to undergraduate students. https://studentaid.gov/understand-aid/types/grants/pell

U.S. Department of Education, The National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments. (n.d.-b) School Climate Improvement. https://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov/school-climate-improvement

U.S. Department of Education. (2002). No child left behind: A desktop reference.https://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/nclbreference/reference.pdf

U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Every student succeeds act: Assessments under title I, part a & title I, part b: Summary of final regulations. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/essaassessmentfactsheet1207.pdf

U.S. Department of Education. (2018a). A leak in the stem pipeline: Taking algebra early. https://www2.ed.gov/datastory/stem/algebra/index.html

U.S. Department of Education. (2018b). Summary table of office of safe and healthy students approved school climate surveys. The National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments. https://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov/sites/default/files/Summary%20Table%20of%20OSHS%20Approved%20School%20Climate%20Surveys_10.22.18_0.pdf

U.S. Department of Education. (2018c). Civil rights data collection: 2017-2018 [Data set]. https://ocrdata.ed.gov/resources/downloaddatafile

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2019). Applications for new awards; School climate transformation grant program: Local educational agency grants. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/06/10/2019-12101/applications-for-new-awards-school-climate-transformation-grant-program-local-educational-agency

U.S. Department of Education. (2020). EDFacts datafiles [Data set]. https://www2.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/edfacts/data-files/index.html

U.S. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform: A report to the nation and the secretary of education, United States Department of Education. Washington, D.C.: National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015004170224

Villa, J. (2017). Tableau classroom training: Desktop II: Intermediate. [Course materials]. Tableau. https://www.tableau.com/learn/classroom

Wang, W., Vaillancourt, T., Brittain, H. L., McDougall, P., Krygsman, A., Smith, D., Cunningham, C. E., Haltigan, J. D. & Hymel, S. (2014). School climate, peer victimization, and academic achievement: Results from a multi-informant study. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(3), 360–377. https://doi-org.lib.pepperdine.edu/10.1037/spq0000084

Wang, M.-T. & Degol, J. L. (2014). Staying engaged: Knowledge and research needs in student engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12073

Wang, M.-T. & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review 28(2), 315-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1

Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. R. (2017). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice. Routledge.

Wexler, N. (2018, April 13). Why American students haven’t gotten better at reading in 20 years. The Atlantic.https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/04/-american-students-reading/557915/

White, M. (2019). The top 10 largest U.S. cities by population. Move, Inc. https://www.moving.com/tips/the-top-10-largest-us-cities-by-population/

Yazzie-Mintz, E. & McCormick, K. (2012). Finding the humanity in the data: Understanding, measuring, and strengthening student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie’s (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 743-761). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_36

Zamora, R. & Hernandez, R. (2016). The impact of organizational health on student achievement in a high needs district. Journal of Studies in Education, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v6i3.9904